(Uh, doubt it!)Īs for UAI, the company doesn’t have any App Store titles itself. UAI warns in the letter also that it’s the owner of the trademark “Flappy” for computer games, and that the developers who are now using that same word in their downloadable mobile games and apps today are likely creating “confusion among consumers” who may mistake the newer “Flappy” games as being created by or affiliated with UAI. UAI currently hosts that same “Flappy” game here on its own website.
#Flappy bat online license
“So technically – yes, we do have a license to use the trademark FLAPPY,” they say.) UAE owns the game, and Big Fish licensed it. We’re told that Big Fish signed a distribution agreement with UAI almost 5 year ago.
#Flappy bat online update
(We’ve reached out to Big Fish Games to confirm details surrounding this claim, and will update if they respond. UAI claims that Big Fish Games, is one of its licensees. One example they specifically point to is this Flash-based online game simply called “Flappy,” which involves a flying bird you navigate using your mouse while trying to avoid smaller birds, and popping balloons.
#Flappy bat online software
The letter alleges that UAI’s use of the word “flappy” dates back as early as February 12, 2006, and has been used in the company’s computer software and downloadable games. (UAI), and its principals Alan and Tina Balodi, are advising the app developer of their trademark application. Of course someone would try to cash in on this craze, but Ultimate Arcade is now not just attempting to gain the trademark for itself – it’s actually going after developers who are using the word “Flappy” in their game’s name, and claiming trademark infringement.Īccording to a notice sent to the developer of one such title, “Flappy Devil,” which arrived by way of Apple’s legal team, Ultimate Arcade, Inc. A company calling itself “Ultimate Arcade” is attempting to trademark the word “Flappy,” following the fervor around the viral App Store game, “Flappy Bird,” whose disappearance led to the creation of hundreds of clones, parody apps, and other similarly-inspired titles. Is it time for the app stores to step up and deal with the problem? Flappy Bird has been one of the highest-profile apps of recent times, and if any protection was going to be put in place, surely it would be for this cultural avalanche? While there are reports of some push-back to developers, Dredge has shown that there are hundreds of clones available, and more arriving each day.This was bound to happen. One-person and smaller studios simply don't have the resources to deal with this onslaught. Not only are developers trying to promote their own app and everything that is unique about it, they are also trying to fight against a rising tide of almost identical titles that are taking away space in the app store listings, filling up the first page of results in a search result, and capturing the mind share of gamers browsing the stores. It's impossible to ignore the problem as well. And any time spent on the legal route represents time and resources that cannot be spent improving the original game, promoting the title, or working on the next potential success.
Once a good idea gets some traction in the story, the cloners will arrive and the original developer can either engage in a huge game of whack-a-mole and raise concerns with the app stores on each clone that arrives (ninety-five Flappy Birds, a day, is a lot of take-down notices required). While clone games (and the majority of the time, it is gaming titles which are rapidly cloned) can have a hugely detrimental effect on the indie developer.
0 kommentar(er)
